Discussion:
OW 1.9 build failing
(too old to reply)
Mat Nieuwenhoven
2018-12-31 06:53:01 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

after some time I wanted to build OW 1.9 again. I had to modified
cmnvars.cmd, and P4 picked up quite a few updates. But the build failed on
some gui thing.
Is Perforce still up to date for OW 1.9?

Mat Nieuwenhoven
n***@efbe.prima.de
2018-12-31 07:58:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mat Nieuwenhoven
Hi,
after some time I wanted to build OW 1.9 again. I had to modified
cmnvars.cmd, and P4 picked up quite a few updates. But the build failed on
some gui thing.
Is Perforce still up to date for OW 1.9?
Yes. I'm doing half automatic builds. Results can be found at
http://efbe.musca.uberspace.de/

CU/2
Frank
Mat Nieuwenhoven
2018-12-31 08:37:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by n***@efbe.prima.de
Post by Mat Nieuwenhoven
Hi,
after some time I wanted to build OW 1.9 again. I had to modified
cmnvars.cmd, and P4 picked up quite a few updates. But the build failed on
some gui thing.
Is Perforce still up to date for OW 1.9?
Yes. I'm doing half automatic builds. Results can be found at
http://efbe.musca.uberspace.de/
Ok, thanks. I'll see what's wrong with my source.
Why are the installers labelled 2.0? I though 2.0 was a different branch?

Mat Nieuwenhoven
n***@efbe.prima.de
2018-12-31 09:23:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mat Nieuwenhoven
Post by n***@efbe.prima.de
Post by Mat Nieuwenhoven
Hi,
after some time I wanted to build OW 1.9 again. I had to modified
cmnvars.cmd, and P4 picked up quite a few updates. But the build failed on
some gui thing.
Is Perforce still up to date for OW 1.9?
Yes. I'm doing half automatic builds. Results can be found at
http://efbe.musca.uberspace.de/
Ok, thanks. I'll see what's wrong with my source.
Why are the installers labelled 2.0? I though 2.0 was a different branch?
After release of 1.9 the version variables were bumped to 2.0.
On github is a different fork/version with new functionality.

CU/2
Frank

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...